These works raise the art of illustration to higher bench mark. They achieve their
pictorial depth in two distinct ways: by illusionistic rendering and by symbolic
references to the larger world of dialectic discourse. These "tarjectories" into
the raging discourse on the nature of art has opened new possibilities for painting
at a time when its future was marked for the sidelines.
The six paintings selected here are intended to show a direct concern with certian
"myths" of modern art, and most especially, the myths woven by American critics
of the fifties, sixties, and seventies.
His works directly challenge the critical assumptions that:
 (1)the historic nature of painting moves to toward "flattness",
 (2)that its "proper" subject is the interaction of color and other optical "spaces",
 (3)that its only "proper" content is this very flattness and color display,
 (4)the underlying assumption that we do directly grasp the "ture" outer world by our senses.
This is understood in philosophic discourse as "naive realism".
Critical acceptence of this position drove painting to pattern marking on over-sized paintings
that became progressively devoid of content or reference, and hence meaningless.
Mark Tansey's paintings show that these formalist dogmas criple painting by taking away
its ability to articulate thought and feeling about our world. It dogmas construct an
incumbering chamber of gates, walls, and shackels. Mark Tansey's wit and humor, brings metaphor
and discourse back into the art of painting.
From Judi Freeman Mark Tansey
From Judi Freeman Mark Tansey
From Judi Freeman Mark Tansey
Aided by Derrida's 1978 book Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles, Tansey explores the nature of
representation through the study of transformation." These are..."optimistically suggestive
of the possibilities other than those suggested by Greenberg and his cohorts."
From Judi Freeman Mark Tansey